Grant Evidence Agent finds evidence for the next grant.
Ask cited questions across completed ChatCME activities, de-identified learner questions, source-use analytics, objectives, and reports. Find the needs, claims, and follow-on opportunities your team can actually defend.
Bring one activity, grant renewal, funder update, or portfolio topic. We will show what the agent can cite and what it should not claim.
Demo questions
Which activities show the strongest evidence for a follow-on program?
What learner questions point to unresolved educational needs?
What can we cite in a renewal narrative without overstating the result?
Which audience segments or objectives deserve a closer look?
Every good answer points back to source material your team can review before it becomes external language.
The problem is not lack of evidence. It is finding the right evidence fast.
Completed activities already contain signals about learner need, evidence use, audience behavior, and objective alignment. The hard part is turning those signals into review-ready material before a grant deadline or funder update.
The evidence is scattered
Grant teams jump between reports, spreadsheets, learner questions, source-use data, and old planning notes to rebuild the story.
The deadline comes first
Renewal narratives, funder updates, and needs assessments often need support before anyone has time for a full portfolio review.
Unsupported claims create risk
The fastest draft is not useful if compliance, outcomes, or education leaders cannot see where each statement came from.
What teams use it for
Grant Evidence Agent is built for the work that happens after the activity: proving what learners needed, what they explored, and where the next education investment belongs.
Find the next needs assessment
Turn real learner questions, objective alignment, and evidence-use signals into source-backed inputs your team can inspect.
Write funder updates with restraint
See which findings are strong enough to summarize for supporters, foundations, internal leadership, or grant committees.
Plan renewals and follow-on programs
Compare completed activities so renewal narratives, topic expansion, and audience segmentation start from evidence.
Know what not to claim
Separate knowledge-gap signals and engagement patterns from unsupported outcomes claims before language leaves your team.
What happens in the demo
A useful demo should not be a tour of every feature. It should answer whether your real education evidence can support the next funding conversation.
Bring one completed activity, portfolio area, renewal, or funder topic
Ask the agent the questions your grant or outcomes team already has
Review citations, unsupported claims, and de-identified learner evidence
Decide whether the first workflow should be a needs assessment, funder update, renewal brief, or planning memo
How Grant Evidence Agent works
It gives your team a reviewable path from completed education activity to cited planning evidence.
Connect the portfolio
Use the governed ChatCME reporting layer: completed reports, de-identified learner questions, citation activity, objectives, and metadata.
Ask grant-focused questions
Search across activities for unmet needs, supportable claims, renewal angles, and follow-on education opportunities.
Review the citations
Inspect the reports, questions, analytics, and activity context behind each answer before using it externally.
Move to a demo-ready plan
Leave with the first evidence workflow your team can evaluate: needs assessment, funder update, renewal brief, or planning memo.
Evidence sources the agent can use
Grant Evidence Agent sits on top of the governed reporting and analytics surface in ChatCME. It points users back to the source material so claims can be reviewed before they appear in a grant, funder update, or planning memo.
Cited evidence beats black-box summaries.
The agent is designed to show where an answer came from: reports, learner questions, evidence-use analytics, or activity metadata. That makes the output reviewable by education, outcomes, grants, compliance, and client teams.
- Built on completed ChatCME reports, not a blank writing prompt
- Designed for review by education, outcomes, grants, compliance, and client teams
- Useful after one strong activity, stronger across a recurring portfolio
Built for the people who have to defend the story
The agent helps different teams inspect the same evidence before language moves into a proposal, update, renewal, or planning memo.
Grant writers looking for a defensible evidence base
Outcomes teams checking what the data actually supports
Education leaders planning the next activity or topic sequence
Client and supporter teams preparing review-ready updates
Questions buyers ask before a demo
The practical question is simple: can the agent help your team find usable evidence without creating new compliance or review risk?
See Grant Evidence Agent with your evidence
Bring one activity, portfolio area, renewal, or funder update. We will show what the agent can cite, what needs review, and where the first evidence workflow should start.