Find the evidence for your next education grant
ChatCME Grant Evidence Agent helps CME grant teams search across reports, learner questions, and analytics signals to uncover cited unmet needs, knowledge gaps, and follow-on education opportunities.
Questions teams can ask
The problem is not missing data. It is too much data.
A single activity report is useful. A portfolio of dozens or hundreds of activities is harder: grant teams cannot remember every theme, report, objective, learner question, and audience segment when planning the next proposal.
Grant Evidence Agent is designed for that moment. It lets grant writers ask a portfolio-level question and review the cited reports, learner chats, and analytics behind the answer instead of manually reopening report after report.
Built for enterprise CME workflows
Grant evidence
Find cited knowledge gaps, learner questions, and unmet needs that can support future independent education planning.
Supporter debriefs
Prepare de-identified, provider-reviewed themes for supporter conversations without exposing learner-level data.
Portfolio planning
Compare disease areas, learning objectives, audience segments, and repeated needs that single-program reports can miss.
Renewal narratives
Turn many completed reports into a concise story about engagement, evidence use, and future opportunity.
Evidence sources the agent can use
Grant Evidence Agent sits on top of the reporting, analytics, and de-identified learner-interaction records your team already builds inside ChatCME.
Foundation
Cited answers, not black-box summaries
Grant Evidence Agent returns portfolio synthesis with inline source labels and evidence cards, so grant writers can inspect the underlying report, chat, or analytics source before using the language externally.
Designed for governed insight, not unsupported claims
The strongest use case is not generic AI chat. It is governed, source-aware synthesis for teams that need to explain what their education portfolio is showing without losing independence, privacy, or review control.
De-identified learner evidence
Answers use de-identified learner interactions and do not expose learner identifiers by default.
Citations before claims
Inline source labels and evidence cards point users back to the reports, chats, and analytics behind each answer.
Supporter access stays governed
Commercial supporters receive provider-approved summaries only. They do not get editorial access or control.
No unsupported outcomes claims
The agent distinguishes outcomes analytics and knowledge-gap signals from separately measured learning outcomes.
From question to usable portfolio evidence
- 1
Ask across the portfolio
Start with a therapeutic area, objective, audience segment, supporter need, or future grant question.
- 2
Review the evidence
The response points back to the reports, learner chats, activities, and analytics signals behind the synthesis.
- 3
Use it with review
Turn the answer into a grant evidence brief, supporter discussion, renewal narrative, or planning memo your team can review.
Talk with us about Grant Evidence Agent
We will walk your team through how Grant Evidence Agent can support source-backed grant evidence, supporter debriefs, renewal narratives, audience-segment questions, and follow-on education planning across many activities.